------------------------------------------------------ ARIZONA MILDMAN HOAX REPORT: 2010

Friday, August 6, 2010

GIVE ME YOUR MONEY!

HI Everyone!
Let me fire off a notice to you as far as scams go, this one is almost undetectable. I want you to look at the whole message anytime anyone sends you a campaign ad that might say this on it: "This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee." What does that mean? That means the money doesn't have to go to the candidate or anything having to do with the party. That means some people who were authorized during the election to help collect campaign contributions are using the same graphics and working off of the white house designed website and built a phony contribution website in order to make it look official and they sent you fancy emails with such heart wrenching stories, Now Hear This! :

John Lewis to me
show details 9:06 AM (20 minutes ago)

(Your first name here, which means they have a program that hacks your email address book in order to find your first name, not a real fancy parlor trick, JavaScript wise, nothing more. I don't know about you, when someone tries to act like my buddy in order to sell me something, I defer to Henry David Thoreau, who said: "...If you see a man coming towards you with the obvious intention of doing you good- run for your life!") --

On March 7th, 1965, 600 of us lined up to walk from Selma to Montgomery, to march for voting rights. When we tried to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge over the Alabama River, we were met by state troopers. They attacked us with tear gas, bullwhips, and nightsticks. It became known as Bloody Sunday, and the national outcry over the brutality that day led to the enactment, exactly 45 years ago today, of the Voting Rights Act.
The progress we've made since then is remarkable. But the expansion of voting rights for millions did not happen overnight. It was the product of a continued struggle, by many people, over many years.

(Are you getting inspired yet? I was feeling like I wish I had been there, and was getting overcome with emotion, which is what they wanted me to feel, I am sure.)

And just as change did not come easily then, it does not come easily now.

(Let me see, did they just use the "C" word again, trying to get people to rubber-stamp the idea that Barrack Obama MUST have endorsed this since it is branded with the word "CHANGE".)

Discrimination still exists in America -- its effects can be as harmful as they were decades ago. And we can always become a better, more just society.

(But not through deceptive con-artistry, through people actually putting themselves on the line and actually doing something - not just writing a check. Tell me how donating to a cause that does not represent a candidate will change the law? Bribery? Paying off a lobbyist, which is what our president speaks out against regularly since long before the election? And please don't get me wrong, the other parties have more scams like this than anyone else, and since most constituents follow blindly like sheep, they are an easy target. This group is trying to suck money out of the party and eventually will get caught in a scandal since they spam everyone who comes on the government websites that are connected to OUR president. This group was supposed to collect for campaign contributions during the election. The polling places ran hate groups off from the polling places last election, this is asking you to volunteer to help stop that. I consider that a worthwhile cause, but....)

Two years ago, this movement -- led by Barack Obama -- (Once again trying use the president's name to justify themselves.) brought millions of people into the political process for the
first time.
I'm told that many of you are working hard now to get as many as possible of those folks -- and others from across the country who are with us in these fights -- to the polls this
year.

It's an important effort, and the legacy of the fight for the Voting Rights Act is that it is not only our right to vote, and to help others do so -- it is our duty. Can I count on you to help out between now and the elections in November? (Man, I got excited, I could help with fair elections and what an honor to stand with some of the same people who marched with Dr. Martin Luther King, one of my heroes.)

When I was a child, I tasted the bitter fruits of racial discrimination -- and I did not like it. That was what spurred me to act. In those early days, we sacrificed our very selves for our rights as Americans. But we never gave up. And now barriers that kept an entire people from full
participation in this country have been removed. No longer are people who look like me met with violence when we register to vote. No longer is the idea that an African American could become
president just a dream. We live in a better world, a better country. But our work is not complete. We cannot wait for someone else to make change. (There's that "C" Word again, God, I love this writer.)

We must all do it. You must do it. I must do it. (Do you hear that? How imperative is this?)

Please sign up to help millions more vote: http://my.barackobama.com/VolunteerVRA

Thank you,

Representative John Lewis

NOW, I AM REALLY INSPIRED. THEN, WHEN YOU CLICK ON THAT LINK IT TAKES YOU TO A WEB PAGE THAT WANTS TO KNOW ALL YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION AND THEN YOUR CREDIT CARD NUMBER IN ORDER TO BE A REAL AMERICAN. MY OPINION ? ? ? LIKE I SAID AT THE BEGINNING, THIS IS WHAT THE DISCLAIMER SAYS AT THE BOTTOM: "This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee."
THIS MEANS THAT NO PARTY OR CANDIDATE IS AFFILIATED WITH YOUR DONATION WHICH MEANS YOU DECIDE WHETHER YOU WANT TO DONATE MONEY TO SOMEONE AT A POST OFFICE IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
BARRACK OBAMA SAID AT A PRESS CONFERENCE THAT HE HAD WARNED "ORGANIZING FOR AMERICA" TO QUIT BOTHERING PEOPLE FOR MONEY, THEY THEN QUIT USING THAT NAME. BUT THIS IS THE SAME SCAM, EVEN THE SAME STYLE OF EMAILS. IF YOU ARE SKEPTICAL, EXPLAIN THIS TO ME. IF I MAKE A DONATION, WHERE DOES MY MONEY GO? FIRST THEY ASK ME TO VOLUNTEER BUT IT SEEMS THEY ARE SAYING THE ONLY WAY TO HAVE A FAIR ELECTION IS NOT TO VOLUNTEER, BUT TO SEND THEM MONEY. DO I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS? OH, HELL YES.

I can't tell if this is the same people or someone else using a copycat of the original scam but, are just asking for money in between elections that is a completely different scam artist, but they are not affiliated with any party or candidate. That is my whole point.

AND: According to Google Maps, the only actual business near there is Riverby Books at 417 E Capitol St SE , Washington, DC 20003-3810 The rest are apartments that are used as fronts and campaign offices for different Senators and Representatives around the area, most of them have a blurb on their website saying that "Organizing for America", which they participated in, was closed down long ago.

Monday, July 26, 2010

Real Writing Jobs Dot Com

The URL is http://www.realwritingjobs.com . I read the supposed reviews about the site and the thing that gripes me is that they all say the same thing, not kind of, I mean word for word, which convinces me that they are all written by realwritingjobs.com, and the other thing is that they (the reviewers) don't tell you who they are and realwritingjobs.com doesn't say who they are, either, No address, no post office box, no nothing, and not even a phone number for you to call to check the validity of this supposed miracle of a job referral site. Here is the real kicker:
Ask yourself right now, if I told you I had a wonderful thing for you on my web page in

Big Bold Letters In Bright Colors

and then all of a sudden, at the bottom of the page - I used the the tiniest text I could, and started saying something that contradicts or denies the validity of the message I just gave you, like I was saying that what I just said was an exageration and that NO WAY was I going to be responsible for you NOT getting what I said my other clients were getting and wrote it in letters that are so small the average person couldn't see them and now, if I wrote them in WHITE TEXT so they would NOT stand out properly with the background of the page, as if I was TRYING to hide/camouflage the lettering so you couldn't see it, WOULD YOU TRUST ME WHEN I USE EVASIVE AND DEVIOUS TACTICS? The answer is simple, NO! But that is what realwritingjobs.com is doing and if you look at their sign up page, it says at the bottom in text so tiny and light that you almost can't see it "...

RealWritingJobs.com - Earnings Disclaimer


EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO ACCURATELY REPRESENT THIS PRODUCT AND IT'S POTENTIAL. EVEN THOUGH THIS INDUSTRY IS ONE OF THE FEW WHERE ONE CAN WRITE THEIR OWN CHECK IN TERMS OF EARNINGS, THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT YOU WILL EARN ANY MONEY USING THE TECHNIQUES AND IDEAS IN THESE MATERIALS. EXAMPLES IN THESE MATERIALS ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS A PROMISE OR GUARANTEE OF EARNINGS. EARNING POTENTIAL IS ENTIRELY DEPENDENT ON THE PERSON USING OUR PRODUCT, THEIR IDEAS AND TECHNIQUES. WE DO NOT PURPORT THIS AS A "GET RICH SCHEME."

ANY CLAIMS MADE OF ACTUAL EARNINGS OR EXAMPLES OF ACTUAL RESULTS ARE NOT TYPICAL. YOUR LEVEL OF SUCCESS IN ATTAINING THE RESULTS CLAIMED IN OUR MATERIALS DEPENDS ON THE TIME YOU DEVOTE TO THE PROGRAM, IDEAS AND TECHNIQUES MENTIONED, YOUR FINANCES, KNOWLEDGE AND VARIOUS SKILLS. SINCE THESE FACTORS DIFFER ACCORDING TO INDIVIDUALS, WE CANNOT GUARANTEE YOUR SUCCESS OR INCOME LEVEL. NOR ARE WE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY OF YOUR ACTIONS.

MATERIALS IN OUR PRODUCT AND OUR WEBSITE MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT INCLUDES OR IS BASED UPON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS GIVE OUR EXPECTATIONS OR FORECASTS OF FUTURE EVENTS. YOU CAN IDENTIFY THESE STATEMENTS BY THE FACT THAT THEY DO NOT RELATE STRICTLY TO HISTORICAL OR CURRENT FACTS. THEY USE WORDS SUCH AS "ANTICIPATE," "ESTIMATE," "EXPECT," "PROJECT," "INTEND," "PLAN," "BELIEVE," AND OTHER WORDS AND TERMS OF SIMILAR MEANING IN CONNECTION WITH A DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL EARNINGS OR FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. "

In other words, if you aren't a professional writer already with somewhat of a good list of credentials and references, then, it isn't going to help you, no matter how talented you might be, if you are a fairly new or novice writer who doesn't have a reputation, already. They tell you when you sign up that it is only $2.95 to start. Then in the fine print later, it says that they start charging you $47 a month as soon as you start.

Bottom line here is this, the email that they are sending out to people in this raggedy economy says "Can You Start Tomorrow" as if they have a job for you. I imagine most unemployed people who wish to write would jump at that that same way I did, at first. They are taking advantage of the fact that people are desperate for work and using an email and a website with NO KNOWN address or contact information except the email link and the "GIVE US MONEY NOW" button entitled "signup today".

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Mitchell N. Kay, P.C.

There actually is a Mitchell N. Kay, P.C. in New York City at 77 Penn St New York New York 10001 who has been the subject of LOTS of legal suits, including two class action suits. They drop the harrassment against the respondents on the law suit and promise not to contact them again and then go right back and get sued again. This man seems to work on the same principle as the people who can hack into your account and screw up your information, as in the movie "Changing Lanes", where someone with some cash like Ben Affleck's character did. There is also a scammer who uses a P.O Box, fake address in Smithtown, N.Y. to try to get people to unwittingly just pay him. If you call the phone number someone with an accent that sounds like they are in India answers the phone and is on a cell phone. They will verify your information until you ask for your Social Security Number. They make one up, at which point you tell them "THAT ISN'T ME!" and they will quickly tell you it must be a case of information theft. It is, and the person on the phone is the information thief. File a complaint with the better business department in New York State if you recieve one of these letters.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Al Gore Invented the Internet


NO, he said that he had part in the "creation of" the internet in a legislatively and economically helpful way when he said, "During my service to the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the internet. I took the initiative in creating in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system."


So it was as if "someone" had been at a business meeting being conducted using Robert's Rules of Order (Parliamentary procedure) and when the chairperson called for a vote (like they do in Congress), and said, "All in favor of funding the creation of a more meaty brand of Dog Food?" If you raised your hand and the vote got passed and the product was created, you could say you were (at least partly, which is what he probably should have said) responsible for it's creation. His statement, although self serving and pretentious, was NOT incorrect until it was misquoted and taken out of context. But that is not reporting - that is intentionally lying. Some people make a living off of lying, some of them are famous for it. Let's look at the whole statement instead of the 'Karl Rove type' version.

So, that means anyone who sweeps the floor at a weather channel station building is qualified to be a weatherman like if you are taken to the hospital in an ambulance that qualifies you to be a paramedic. Fox News lies so much that I don't know who that guy actually is, probably another Joe the Plumber. By the way, Joe the Plumber is no longer a fan of either Sarah Palin or John McCain, it seems. Joe, who lied on camera when asked several questions (isn't that what they said Bill Clinton was "evil" for?) known as Sam Wurzelbacher, told an audience in Pennsylvania that McCain "is no public servant."
"McCain was trying to use me," Wurzelbacher said, according to public radio correspondent Scott Detrow. "I happened to be the face of middle Americans. It was a ploy.”
"I don’t owe him s—," Wurzelbacher continued. "He really screwed my life up, is how I look at it.”
Come on! He stood there and lied intentionally to the camera in order to help Senator John (the liar) McCain and now when he has to face the consequences (public diapproval, loss of business, etc.) he is whining. I hope you all know how he is related to McCain. His father in law was Charles Keating, a notorious land swindler in Arizona that, McCain and five other congressmen, caused the aquital for despite the damning evidence that he was guilty. The Keating Five Scandal



Most everyone with a brain can see that this was meant as an answer to another specific question not the dog and pony show, out of context, idiotic egomaniacal statement that Conservatives would like you to believe he said which is actually the first thing most conservatives I know use to base their opinion of how idiotic that they believe Democrats are, which IS voiced over and over and didn't include his original statement, in order to infer that they were presenting both sides of a debate correctly type of logical fallacy statement like those below:
(Let's also look at who started the Rumor that quickly was spread through the public the following day and remember next time (if your brain can actually work that well) who tries to immediately confuse the public everytime they get a chance with nonsense. )
AND , HERE IS THE GUY WHO SAYS DIFFERENT:



So, did he say he invented the initiative? NO! But, I imagnine that trailer park refugee who can't read or doesn't understand ENGLISH well enough to listen to the words, "I took the initiative..." instead of seizing on it as a faupaux that actually is a mistake on their part. He also said he took the initiative concerning advance education. Does that mean he said he invented advanced education? #@%$& NO! But someone wanting to discredit or disbelieve anything who runs against "Their Candidate" wants to hear is what was heard instead of the truth. I would blame just a bunch of illiterates BUT, there are bigger sharks in the water hear. When you see the guy swimmning Shark Warning Waters with a black bathing cap that scares people, it's time to say, "BAD HAT, HARRY!" That brings me to the real evil behind all of this in the form of the devil incarnate, his name is Rupert Murdoch, and why do I say this? When it comes to Global Climate Disaster as it is NOW KNOWN GLOBALLY, even though some people who thought they could escape to another planet when they destroyed this one said at the time, "What? Why should we worry about that? I never heared of nutthin' lawk That!" Unfortunately some of us listened to the Trailer Park Redneck in a suit.
You will notice (A) his credits include that he works for another Rupert Murdoch station like Fox News and that NO ONE ELSE but FAUX NEWS (including his weather station employer) wants to even listen to this nonsense and B) This is their expert. His argument is, "Well, are you sure? I don't think so."
I tell you what. The next time you are on trial for murder and facing the death penalty, tell your lawyer to use, "I don't think so", as a defense, OK?
If you have ever tried to argue with a two year old that whatever they want is not theirs while they scream, "MINE!", then you are realising the same kind of logic in a, "I don't think so.", debate from someone who admitted to not being a scientist and that no one who "actually is" a scientist will even listen to his CRACKPOT ass or wants to waste the forty minute lecture on someone whose argument is going to result in as much sense as Emily Letilla on Saturday Night Live! Those of you who are too young or don't remember Emily from Saturday Night live, I will give you an exerpt from one the SNL shows:
Chevy Chase: And tonight we are priveleged to have a substitute teacher Emily Litella to do tonight's weekly feature commentary !"
(Applause from the Audience)
Emily Litella: "Thank You. I would like tonight to address something I keep hearing about on the news. What's all this talk about FLEA ERECTIONS in Central America? Why should we care one iota about the sexual habits of insects in a foreign country. First of all, they don't even live here..."
Chevy Chase: (each word getting louder) "Miss Litella, Miss Litella, ... EMILY!"
Emily Litella: "What?"
Chevy Chase: "The subject is Free Elections, not Flea Erections, FREE ELECTIONS."
Emily Litella: "Oh, well that is completely different. Never mind!" (big smile)
But with the kind of conservatives that watch Fox News, they don't seem to get to the point that they say, "Never mind", or they seem to forget it was wrong. I said
that they 'seem' to not notice or 'somehow forget' that their argument was alreaday proven to be false and that it is was completely wrong. When someone proves to you in Black and White that something is completely false then you don't have to say, "Okay, I was wrong." You can go from person to person telling them this complete Horse **** until you find another person who is naiive enough to say, "Really? I didn't know that," and then they run around telling people what they heard from you and eventually they have expanded on the story. That is the heart and soul of propaganda which is the same thing as saying "False Rumor".
If only one news channel says something while everyone else is denying it, then, you might want to decide that the one news source maybe made a mistake or was wrong. Or you can run around telling other people the rumor while trying to convince yourself it was corect.
Ask yourself something else. If you found out that somethng you heard from everyone but one person was inconvenient to deal with and ONE person said different, would you believe that one person? A large group of Americans seem to believe so. You can't educate people who won't listen. Let me give an example: I.E. the alcoholic or addict. If you ask them what is going on in their life, they will tell you that they are fine, honest, upstanding human beings with moral and philosophical convictions galore and that they have NO PROBLEMS with Drugs or Alcohol, they are just going through a rough patch. Ask yourself, do you believe the one person compared to the many others? Some of you do. You want to listen to the voice in the wilderness who is completely delusional and seizes on every opportunity to lie.
That is why in internet classes in college the first thing that they teach is something called ETHICS and the first thing the teacher says is, "You must be certain that anything you say is HONEST! That is because no matter what you say, the first thing you say, no matter how many retractions is what people will remember. If you lie, they remember the lie, even if it is proven repeatedly that it is WRONG. That is how Tabloid Journalism works. The Enquirer says that there was a space alien baby found in a farmhouse in Southern Idaho and some people WANT to believe it, it is like they like being lied to. There is an old saying, "A lie can run completely around the world while before the truth is finished putting on it's shoes." If you say something on the internet you can't take it back, people will remember it and not believe anything else."


And since the White House staff of George Bush finally had to admit that Global Warming is real and that Fossil Fuels help create a danger to our environment, then where was FAUX NEWS when that was said? Why are there still people wandering around stating that "The Jury Is Still Out" on the case, when it comes to global warming. The other idiots are trying to act like Polar Bears drowning is normal and whole species of animals like "Flying Foxes" being wiped out is normal also.


Adolph Hitler's regime relied on propaganda to keep itself from being looked on as monstrous by the rest of the world. They sent out news messages constantly that were completely fictitious because the majority of people WANT to believe that things are peachy and that no one could possibly be lying to them. His propaganda minister was a man named Joseph Goebels. The saying that he will always be famous for was, "If you tell and lie big enough and keep telling it, the people will believe you." You have to remember the Nazis hated the "masses" like most conservative people do. They believe they are doing "the masses" a favor by lying to them and leading them since as Adolph Hitler stated in Mein Kampf, "...the masses are contemptable sheep that need to be led." Whenever anyone believes that they are superior, they think it is doing those below them a favor by "leading them" by whatever means necessary. They hide behind money religion or politics and think the rest of us are too beneath them to understand the truth as they believe it. Remember that.


Along with that description think about who you know who is told constantly by their "leaders" that they are superior to others because of their Religion, Race, and Intelligence. That is the basis of propaganda leadership and the heart and mind of the people known as "Facists".


There are hundreds of site out there that will debunk any rumor and it is better to listen to whatever THEY say is true since their whole commitment is to find the truth and they don't have any other financial or political motive to lie. Snopes.com is only for people who want the truth. If you want to live in your own world, don't ever check facts and continue to live in your own little world.

What one must remember is that everyone who can talk over you like a bully is not correct. One who controls both sides of an argument is doing so in order to lie. When someone stops the person who is validating his facts by interrupting with nonsense to keep from letting someone speak is someone you shouldn't really listen to. Those are manners of creating a "FALLACY" and there is a place to check those on the internet too. But those of you who are convinced that the saying, "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion better look at what Opinion is compared to fact. Debates aren't won on opinions, just facts because opinions are usually wrong, that is why they aren't called FACTS! And yes, you are entitled to be wrong, but don't expect me to knowingly join you. If you want to find out all about how tabloid news works, then read all of these: Fallacies and you will begin to recognise them while watching the news commentaries on Fox News. One of their biggest ones is when they 'imply' something rather than state it. This is done by asking the lie in the form of a quesion. "Do spacemonkey slaves from the future figure into the doctrine of the present presidential administration?" You will notice most FOX NEWS stories start out with a tabloid news question like that. It saves them from being sued since when taken to court they can say, "Well, I just asked the question, it was up to the public to decide the answer." They say this as if the rest of the story wasn't full of accusations instead of facts. This is like Rush Limbaugh saying, "How do we know these financial donations to the Red Cross aren't somehow ending up in the campaign fund for Barack Obama?", then when he got yelled at he said, "I never told anyone not to donate!" What is the difference, you slimey punk liar?